Concerns that telling would-be cyclists to protect themselves with helmets and hi-viz might make cycling look more dangerous than it is, and thereby inadvertently put people off cycling rather than get them started, appear to be groundless.
This is according to new research from psychologists at the University of Bath which is likely to reassure local authorities and charities who have often made safety a key part of their pro-cycling messages. But the new study also suggests that, if we really want to get more people cycling and improve public health, it’s going to take more than words to make any difference.
With cycling levels in the UK, like in many parts of the world, stagnating or even declining according to latest official statistics, the authors of the new study wanted to assess ways to encourage more cycling among all in society, in particular those going about their daily business.
In the study, published this month in the Journal of Transport & Health, coinciding with today’s Cycle to Work Day, the authors point to the massive health benefits more cycling would bring.
Through their project they compared the effect of campaigns designed to instil safety messages versus those intended to promote the health benefits on people’s cycling intentions and studied the impact of campaigns on the cycling intentions of 228 adults, split between cyclists and non-cyclists.
Whilst they conclude that safety-focused campaigns are unlikely to have any obvious or immediate effect on non-cyclists’ perceptions of danger or intentions to start riding, they found that health-focused campaigns made cycling seem more beneficial, specifically among non-cyclists.
In recent years, there has been growing concern that safety fears may be turning people off cycling and back into the car, in particular for short, utility journeys, for example a cycle ride to work or to the shops.
The study is titled ‘Bicycling campaigns promoting health verses campaigns promoting safety: A randomised controlled online study of ‘dangerization’ and is the first study to test the theory that safety messages might have unintended consequences by drawing attention to risks that people might otherwise not have noticed.
Dr Ian Walker, of the University’s Department of Psychology, explained: "The fears some people had about mentioning safety to prospective new cyclists look to be groundless. This is great, as it means authorities probably haven’t inadvertently been scaring people away from cycling all these years with well-meaning safety advice.
“But at the same time, although our study shows health information is useful for non-cyclists, it also shows that information alone isn’t going to be enough to make people take up cycling. Safe streets are what will most make the difference if we want to see more cycling.”
Co-author, Dr Tim Gamble, said: “Whilst the picture for cycling in certain cities may appear to be suggest it’s on the up, across the UK we are seeing uptake actually stagnating or even falling in places.
“In order to increase cycling levels throughout the country and to bring about the enormous benefits active transport can bring to an individual’s health and the wider environment we need to rethink how it’s promoted with a renewed focus on the enjoyment it can bring.
“The focus on safety concerns seen in certain publicity campaigns in recent years may not be deterring cyclists as much as we had feared. But in our study, although telling people who currently don’t cycle about the health benefits helped them realise how good cycling could be for them, even this didn’t make them look more likely to actually get onto a bicycle.”
Dr Walker added: “This all suggests that no promotional campaign is going to be enough to get people out of their cars. What’s needed is a much more concrete action. That’s why it’s exciting to see developments like the completely separate superhighways being built right now in London.”
Although a handful of UK cities are bucking the trend, most notably London, the overall picture for the UK is gloomier. According to the ONS, the figure for those cycling in their early 30s has remained unchanged over the past decade and for those in their late 20s it has actually dropped.
In recent years, the World Health Organisation (WHO) has indicated that more cycling would dramatically improve public health – indeed, the WHO has speculated that an increase in the number of trips by bike could be ‘the single best thing’ a society could do for public health.